Literature Analysis: Strengthening the Competence of Horticulture Students through Community-Based Learning Methods
Keywords:
Community-base Learning, Learning Method, StudentAbstract
Community-based learning (CBL) has become one of the growing approaches in higher education, especially in the field of horticulture. It gives students the opportunity to be directly involved in projects involving local communities, allowing them to apply the theories learned in the classroom to complex real-life situations. Through PFS, students gain not only theoretical knowledge but also practical skills that are essential in the world of work. However, the application of PFS in horticultural education faces challenges, including the gap between community needs and existing curriculum structures. This imbalance can reduce the effectiveness of PFS in achieving educational goals. Therefore, there is a need for better integration between the academic curriculum and community needs, as well as support from the government and relevant institutions. This support includes the provision of adequate resources, supportive policies, and sufficient funding to ensure that PFS can be implemented sustainably and deliver optimal outcomes for students and communities. In addition, it is important to strengthen collaboration between universities and local stakeholders to bridge the gap between theory and practice so that education can provide maximum benefits for all parties involved.
References
Billig, S. H., & Eyler, J. (2003). Research agenda for service-learning: Studying the impact of service-learning on students and communities. Information Age Publishing.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1996.11780257
Crabtree, R. D. (2013). The intended and unintended consequences of international service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 17(2), 43-66.
Darby, A., & Newman, G. (2014). The effects of service-learning on student learning in horticulture. Journal of Experiential Education, 37(3), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825913517142
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass.
Felten, P., & Clayton, P. H. (2011). Service-learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(128), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.467
Furco, A. (2010). The community engagement and service learning: Promising policies and practices. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 1(1), 50-60.
Gelmon, S. B., Holland, B. A., Driscoll, A., Spring, A., & Kerrigan, S. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact.
Guthrie, K. L., & McCracken, H. (2010). Service-learning and technology: The promise for higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(1), 28-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-010-9022-2
Heffernan, K. (2001). Fundamentals of service-learning partnerships. Campus Compact.
Holland, B. A. (2001). Characteristics of “engagement” and institutional commitment to service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8(3), 30-41.
Jacoby, B. (2014). Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned. John Wiley & Sons.
Kiely, R. (2005). A transformative learning model for service-learning: A longitudinal case study. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 12(1), 5-22.
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University.
Mays, N., Pope, C., & Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1258/1355819054308576
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(2), 50-65.
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. University of Lancaster.
Pribbenow, D. A. (2005). The impact of service-learning pedagogy on faculty teaching and learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 11(2), 25-38.
Saltmarsh, J., & Zlotkowski, E. (2011). Higher education and democracy: Essays on service-learning and civic engagement. Temple University Press.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Yeh, T. L. (2010). Service-learning and the effectiveness of online teaching: The promise and challenges. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 194-204.
Zlotkowski, E. (1999). Pedagogy and engagement. In B. Jacoby & Associates (Eds.), Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices (pp. 96-120). Jossey-Bass.
